Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28159 (AP)

Midathala Ujjanna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/1228/2026 · 2026-01-18

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010720492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 1228/2026 Between: 1. MIDATHALA UJJANNA,, S/O MIDATHALA SEENAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO. C-135, GONDIREDDIPALLI VILLAGE, RAPTHADU MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, RAPTHADU MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seeking the dispossess the petitioner from the land to an extent of Ac. 4.59 Cents in Sy.No. 434-1 situated at Gondireddipalli Village, Rapthadu Mandal, Ananthapuramu District (herein referred as Subject Property) without issuing any notice and without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in violation of the Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of 2 India, principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to dispossess the petitioners from the above said land and pass and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 5th respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the land to extent of Ac. 4.59 Cents in Sy.No. 434-1 situated at Gondireddipall Village, Rapthadu Mandal, Ananthapuramu District without issuing any notice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent not to delete the name of the petitioner from the webland to an extent of Ac. 4.59 Cents in Sy.No. 434-1 situated at Gondireddipall Village, Rapthadu Mandal, Ananthapuramu District without following due process of law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ALLU HARI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This Writ Petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in seeking to dispossess the petitioner from the land to an extent of Ac.4.59 cents in Sy.No.434-1 situated at Gondireddipalli Village, Rapthadu Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 5th respondent received today submits that the 4th respondent issued orders with respect to the ROR Appeal filed by one Smt. Balagonda Jayalakshmi, W/o. B. Nadipi Mallanna of Gondireddipalli Village directing the 5th respondent to deduct Ac.0.50 cents out of Ac. 4.59 cents in Sy.No.434-1 from the extent of the petitioner (Khata No.1603) and for deletion of the present entry in Sy.No.434-4 to an extent of Ac.1.50 cents of Gondireddipalli Village, standing in the name of Ms.Midatala Osuramma. Even after the above said order of the 4th respondent in the above said appeal, the petitioner retains an extent of Ac.4.09 cents in Sy.No.434-1. The respondents are not trying to dispossess the petitioner from his rightful portion of the land. The said written instructions of the 5th respondent shall be made as part of the Court record. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, as the written instructions of the 5th respondent is clear that they are not interfering with the 4 rightful portion of the land of the petitioner, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 19.01.2026 SCH 5 123 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN W.P.No.1228 of 2026 Date: 19.01.2026 SCH