Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28139 (PNJ)

JXXXX SXXXX v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/33666/2026 · 2026-07-09

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M No.33666 of 2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CRM-M No.33666 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision :09.07.2026 JXXXXX SXXXX ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG, Haryana. SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) : 1. This is a petition for anticipatory bail, filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, in a case arising out of FIR No.28 dated 19.01.2026, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 190, 191(3), 115, 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Shahabad, District Kurukshetra. 2. Report of Juvenile Justice Board has been received. As per Juvenile Justice Board the petitioner was below the age of 18 at the time of commission of offence. As per report the petitioner is capable of knowing natural consequences of this act. 3. On the instructions of P/SI Avinash Kumar, the learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case the custodial interrogation is not required. 4. In view of above, the present petition is hereby allowed and the MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.09 20:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M No.33666 of 2026 (O&M) 2 order dated 11.06.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 09.07.2026 Manoj Bhutani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.09 20:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document