APHC010723112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40/2026 Between: 1. KOMMALAPATI SUBBAYAMMA @ SUNEETHA, W/O ANJANI RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O ANNAVARAM VILLAGE PEDANANDIPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. KOMMALAPATI ANJANI RAO, S/O AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O ANNAVARAM VILLAGE PEDANANDIPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522007 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENTOF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522007 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARTHIPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522019 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR, PEDANANDIPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522019 6. MUDDANA BHASKARARAO, S/O LATE HARI BABU AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 5-46/3 PALAPARRU VILLAGE, 2 PEDANANDIPADU MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522019 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GHANTA SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40/2026 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the coercive and high handed actions of Respondent No.5, in interfering in the civil dispute by summoning the petitioners to the police station and continuously harassing with threats of a binding over case and directing the petitioner not to enter in to the land admeasuring Ac.2.60 cents in Sy.No.161/4 of Palaparru village, Pedanandipadu Mandal, Guntur District as arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted, unconstitutional and in violation of Article 14, 21 and, 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 5 not to interfere in the civil dispute which is pending before the competent Civil Court and dispossess the petitioner from the subject land.…” 2. Heard Sri Ghanta Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondent- police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents by summoning the petitioners to the police station and directing the petitioners not to enter the subject land. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of the 6th respondent, a case in Cr.No.124 of 2025 was registered against the petitioners and 2 others, under Sections 329(3), 324(4) r/w 3(5) of BNS of Pedanandipadu P.S. 4 Except registration of the above crime, the respondent police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which has been registered against the petitioners. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40/2026 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS