Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28132 (MAD)

Athitya Agro Khem v. Superintendent of GST and Central Excise

WP/18014/2026 · 2026-06-03

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 18014 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 18014 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.19363 & 19365 of 2026 Athitya Agro Khem Rep by its Partner Mrs.J.Hemalatha 16/3, Erikadu, Ayothiyapattinam, Salem-636 103. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Superintendent of GST and Central Excise, Salem IV Range, No.15, 2nd Floor, Rajaram Nagar Main Road, Sahadevpuram, Salem, Taml Nadu- 636 007. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Impugned Order in Original Sl.No. 01/2024-GST (SUPDT )dated 20.03.2024 along with its Summary in Form GST DRC-07 bearing reference ZD330524005706N dated 02.05.2024 issued by the Respondent, to quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Disha Jain For Respondent(s): Mr.Su.Srinivasan, SPC https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18014 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 20.03.2024 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.Su.Srinivasan, learned Senior Panel Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed long after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 50% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18014 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 03-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To Superintendent of GST and Central Excise, Salem IV Range, No.15,2nd Floor, Rajaram Nagar Main Road, Sahadevpuram, Salem, Taml Nadu- 636 007. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18014 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 18014 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.19363 & 19365 of 2026 03-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis