SHAIK HAJARATH VALI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/363/2026 · 2026-01-05
D Ramesh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28132 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28132 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010722612025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 363/2026 Between:
1. SHAIK HAJARATH VALI, S/O. CHINNA SULTHAN SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. DAPPALAMPADU VILLAGE, GUDLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523113.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT.SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH -
522237.
2. THE DISTRICT COLTECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 524001.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKURU, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 524131.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, GUDLURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523281.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the respondent in deleting the name of the petitioner in
2
Form 1-B (RoR) Record, Adangal/Pahani in respect of an extent of Ac. 1.03 cents out of Ac.2.61 cents in Sy.No.133-1, an extent of Ac.2.37 cents in Sy.No.134-2 and an extent of Ac.0.47 cents in Sy.No.146-10 situated at Puretipalli Village, Gudluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District there by creating a cloud on his property without issuing any notice and without passing any
order and without having any power or authority and even without following any procedure under any law as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of AP Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act 1971 and consequently direct the respondents to restore the name of the petitioner forthwith in revenue records by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.08.2025 in respect of the above said land and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent revenue authorities to restore the name of the petitioner in 1-B (RoR) Record, Adangal/Pahani in respect of an extent of Ac.1.03 cents out of Ac.2.61 cents in Sy.No.133-1, an extent of Ac.2.37 cents in Sy.No.134-2 and an extent of Ac.0.47 cents in Sy.No.146-10 situated at Puretipalli Village, Gudluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District forthwith by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.08.2025, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in deleting the petitioner’s name from Form-1B (RoR) and Adangal/Pahani in respect of lands admeasuring Ac.1.03 cents in Sy.No.133- 1, Ac.2.37 cents in Sy.No.134-2 and Ac.0.47 cents in Sy.No.146-10, situated at Puretipalli Village, Gudluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, without issuing notice, passing any order or following due procedure, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice, Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and the provisions of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, and consequently to direct the respondents to restore the petitioner’s name in the revenue records by considering his representation dated 18.08.2025.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
3. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that, despite submitting a representation/PGRS application dated 18.08.2025 seeking recording of his name in the revenue records in respect of the property in question, no action has been taken till date.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents, has stated that as per the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971, the respondent authorities
4
will consider the representation/PGRS application submitted by the petitioner and they will pass appropriate orders after giving notice to the concerned persons.
5. Considering the above submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the respondents especially 4th respondent to consider the representation/PGRS application made by the petitioner on 18.08.2025 as per the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of one (1) month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH
6th January, 2026 cbn
5
191 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
Writ Petition No.363 of 2026
6th January, 2026 cbn