Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28131 (AP)

AKULA SATYANARAYANA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/783/2026 · 2026-01-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010719702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 783/2026 Between: 1. AKULA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. PADMARAJU, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 1-77, PATTENAPALEM (V), JANGAREDDY GUDEM (M) ELURU DISTRICT. 534001 2. AKULA SRINIVASARAO,, S/O. PADMARAJU,2. AGE 48 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 2-77, PATTENAPALEM (V), JANGAREDDY GUDEM (M) ELURU DISTRICT. 534001 3. AKULA CHELLARAO,, S/O. PADMARAJU,3. AGE 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 2-77, PATTENAPALEM (V), JANGAREDDY GUDEM (M) ELURU DISTRICT.534001 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 522020 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT. 534001 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT. 534001 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM REVENUE DIVISION, ELURU DISTRICT. 534001 6. THE TAHASILDAR, BUTTAYAGUDEM MANDAL, ELUM DISTRICT. 534001 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BUTTAYAGUDEM POLICE STATION, BUTTAYAGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 534001 8. RAMISETTY RAJU, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGE43 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. PATTENAPALEM (V), JANGAREDDY GUDEM (M) ELURU DISTRICT. 534001 9. RAMISETTY SRINU, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGE 40 YEARS, PATTENAPALEM (V), JANGAREDDY GUDEM (M) ELURU DISTRICT. 534001 10. RAMISETTY SATYANARAYANA, , S/O. BRAHMAIAH, AGE 65 YEARS, PATTENAPALEM (V), JANGAREDDY GUDEM (M) ELURU DISTRICT. 534001 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 3 to 7 in failing to protect the lives and properties of the Petitioners despite their representation dated 23.12.2025 continuing earlier representations, from the illegal encroachments, harassment, and threats by Respondent Nos. 8 to 10 in Sy.Nos. 27/1, 32/2, and 54/3 situated in Sitaramanagaram Revenue Village, Jainavarigudem Grama Panchayat, Buttayagudem Mandal, wielding deadly weapons, threatening the Petitioners, and destroying their agricultural properties such as motors and power tools, is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 19, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India.” 2. Sri P.V.S.K.Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, let there be a direction to the Police to consider the representation of the Petitioners. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent No.7 is directed to look into the representation of the Petitioners and take appropriate course of action according to governing rules and law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:08.01.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.783 of 2026 Dt.08.01.2026 Dinesh