Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2813 (KAR)

SRI M SHANKARAIAH v. SMT. NIRAMALA

WP/22503/2021 · 2026-04-08

Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19235 WP No. 22503 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 22503 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. M. SHANKARAIAH S/O LATE MURARAIAH AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 96, POST OFFICE ROAD, NELAMANGALA TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHA D. JOSHI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NIRAMALA W/O SRI. R. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.54, D CROSS, III BLOCK, IIND STAGE, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU - 560 072. 2. SMT. M.R. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE N.M. LAKSHMIPRASAD, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3279, 4TH CROSS, C BLOCK, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19235 WP No. 22503 of 2021 II STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010. 3. SMT. M.R. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE PUTTALAKSHMAIAH N.V AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS RESIDING AT KORATAGERE TOWN KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 129. 4. SMT. M.R. VIMALA W/O SRI. M.B. SHIVANANDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 1420 16TH CROSS, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 078. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS DTD. 18.10.2021 IN O.S.NO.93/2016 BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA REJECTING THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER I RULE 10(2) OF CPC AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19235 WP No. 22503 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER 1. It is noticed that the suit in O.S.No.93/2016 is decreed on 29.10.2025. 2. In view of the same, the present writ petition would not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7