Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28119 (JHR)

AMIR SOHEL @ RAJA BABU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9250/2026 · 2026-10-05

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:29687] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9250 of 2026 ------ Amir Sohel @ Raja Babu, aged about 25 years, S/o Md. Yunus Ansari, R/o Vill- Chhotki Barhi, Rasiya Dhamna, P.O. & P.S. Barhi, Dist- Hazaribag .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sidhant Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-05-10-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No.240 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 111(3), 111(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25(1- B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in the organized crime and one country-made pistol along with three live cartridges and one fired cartridge was recovered from his possession which he had kept illegally. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-10 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.07.2026 as has been mentioned in para-07 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Hazaribagh in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No.240 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-05.10.2026-Animesh/