NIDAMANURI PEDDA TIRUPALU v. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI, I.A.S
CC/1938/2023 · 2026-02-16
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28117 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28117 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010717542022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1938/2023 Between:
1. NIDAMANURI PEDDA TIRUPALU, S/O. GURAVAIAH,AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O. 4-103, NUZENDLA VILLAGE, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEPARTMENT (R.D-II), 5TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO.107, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI KONA SASIDHAR IAS, COMMISSIONER, PR 86 RD, 0/O.
COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, D. NO.12-47, PVS ICON, PATHURU CROSS ROAD, TADEPALLI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, 2ND BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, ROOM NO.-290,
A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI SIVA SANKAR LOTHETI, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, AP. 5. SRI SUBBARAYUDU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, A.P.
2
6. SRI VENKATA REDDY, THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, NUZENDLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, A.P.
7. SRI MAHENDRA, PUTCHANUTHALA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PUTCHANUTHALA PANCHAYAT, NUZENDLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, A.P.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein and punish them with maximum imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Orders passed by the Hon'ble A.P. High Court dated 21.07.2022 passed in W.P. No. 19636 of 2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioners to file the Contempt against the Respondent No.7 for disobedience and disregard shown against the passed in WP.No. 19636 of 2022 dated 21.07.2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of Certified Order Copy in W.P. No. 19636 dated. 21.07.2022.
21.07.2022. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. ASHOK RAM V
2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
3. OMKAR D
3
4. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI-08069/AP/3204/2001 The Court made the following:
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:1938 OF 2023
ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 21.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.19636 of 2022.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders dated 21.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.19636 of 2022 are complied with and no further orders are necessary and requested to close the contempt case.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner is no more and the learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to get instructions regarding compliance of the orders of this Court. He further requested to close the contempt case by observing the submission made by the
learned counsel for the respondents.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for both the parties, and in view of the compliance reported by the learned counsel for the respondents, no further orders are necessary.
5
6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner for initiating separate proceedings for further claim, if any. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 17.02.2026 BSP
6
81
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
(closed)
Contempt Case No.1938 of 2023
17.02.2026 BSP