160 Ranjula & ors. ...... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & ors. ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aayish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. DAG, Haryana *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners seek issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to decide the pending Executive Revision bearing ER No.17449 of 2026 (Annexure P-6) titled as “Ranjula & anr. Vs. Mainawati & ors.” 2 Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that along with the revision petition, an application was filed seeking interim relief. The said application has been pending since May 2026. The stay application has not been decided and the execution of the order of partition is being carried out. 3 Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. DAG, Haryana on instructions from respondent No.2 would submit that the matter is pending for tomorrow i.e. POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.10 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 10.07.2026. An endeavor shall be made to decide at least the interim application by tomorrow or within a week thereafter. 4 In view of the statement made by Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. DAG, Haryana, no further order is required to be passed. 5 Petition stands disposed off. ( PANKAJ JAIN ) 09.07.2026 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.10 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document