2026:JHHC:30048 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8297 of 2026 Mustfa Ansari @ Mustafa Ansari, aged about 40 years, son of Lal Mohammad, resident of Village-Jogidih, P.O. and P.S.- Margomunda, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 07/07.10.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 80 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 111(2) (b), 111(3)(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) & 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66 (B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84 (C) of the Information Technology Act, now pending in the Court of the Learned Additional Sessions Judge – II - cum- Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 27.05.2026. He submits that charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner thereafter submits that one mobile and two SIMs are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The mobile and one of the SIMs is standing in the name of the petitioner and the other SIM is standing in the name of another person. He further submits that no crime link has been found and no victim has been identified. 5. Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and 2026:JHHC:30048 2 considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent coupled with the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II - cum- Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 80 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The state is directed to ensure that the materials collected during further investigation be forwarded to the court concerned. 8. Learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate this order to the Superintendent of Police of the concerned district to ensure compliance. 9. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 10. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.10.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:08.10.2026