CITIZEN WELFARE SOCIETY (R) v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/9284/2026 · 2026-04-08
Sachin Shankar Magadum
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2810 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2810 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19506 WP No. 9284 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 9284 OF 2026 (GM-KSR)
BETWEEN:
CITIZEN WELFARE SOCIETY (R) A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960, BEARING REGISTRATION NO.SOR/RJR/S-24/2012- 13, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 3403, 2ND MAIN, 2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560040, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI M. C. PUTTARAMARADHYA.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIRISH KRISHNA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIETIES, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001,
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19506 WP No. 9284 of 2026
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES, 4TH ZONE, SAHAKARA SOUDHA, 3RD FLOOR, 3RD MAIN, 8TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003.
3.
SRI. N. CHANDRASHEKAR, ENQUIRY OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, 2ND ZONE, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU -560003.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K P YOGANNA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENQUIRY REPORT DATED 31.12.2025 (ANNEXURE-V) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3-ENQUIRY OFFICER, IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER SOCIETY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19506 WP No. 9284 of 2026
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 08.04.2026, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition as having become infructuous.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the said memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
DS CT: TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 91