Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28098 (ORI)

KANHU NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/8146/2026 · 2026-07-23

V Narasingh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 8146 of 2026 Kanhu Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. M.K. Chand, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 23.07.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 849 of 2026 pending on the file of learned SDJM, Khurda, arising out of Khurda P.S. Case No.388 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 305(e), 329(3), 3(5) of B.N.S, r.w.s- 51 of OMMC Rule r.w 21(1) MMDR Act. 3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail. 4. Taking into account the nature of allegation and the submissions made, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just p. 2 and proper subject to verification of not more than one criminal antecedent of similar nature. 5. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has more than one criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to. 6. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 7. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Jina