IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 106 CWP-20630-2026 Date of Decision: 10.07.2026 DHRAM PAL AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel, at the very outset, on instructions states that the petitioners would be satisfied, if the concerned Authority of the respondents is directed to decide their representation, Annexure P-4 in light of Annexure P-5. 2. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 4. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the concerned Authority of the respondents to look into the representation, Annexure P-4, expeditiously, taking note of Annexure P-5, in accordance with law. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 10, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.10 16:35 I am the author of this document