- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35853 WP No. 4825 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 4825 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. H.NAGESH, S/O. JAVAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O. KERAGODU HOBLI, B.HOSUR, HOSUR-MANDYA, KRISHNARAJPET, MANDYA-571 402. 2. SRI. H.N.SHIVAKUMAR, S/O. NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. KERAGODU HOBLI, B.HOSUR, HOSUR-MANDYA, KRISHNARAJPET, MANDYA-571 402. 3. SMT. H.N.RENUKA, D/O. SRI NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, W/O. SRI. Y.K.SOMASHEKHAR, R/O. YELACHAKANAHALLI, TUBINAKERE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KRISHNARAJPET, MANDYA-571 402. 4. SMT. H.N.MAMATHA, D/O. SRI NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, WIFE OF GAVIGOWDA K.P., RESIDING AT KYATHANAHALLI VILLAGE, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA-571 427. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35853 WP No. 4825 of 2026 5. H.N.UMA, D/O. SRI. NAGESH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. KERAGODU HOBLI, B.HOSUR, HOSUR-MANDYA, KRISHNARAJPET, MANDYA-571 402. 6. SRI. Y.K.SOMASHEKHAR S/O. LATE KARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O. YELACHAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, TUBINAKERE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KRISHNARAJPET, MANDYA-571 402. 7. SMT. HEMALATHA W/O. MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. YELACHAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, TUBINAKERE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KRISHNARAJPET, MANDYA-571 402. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. BINISHA R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HARIPRASAD M.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANK OF BARODA A BODY CORPORATE CONSTITUTED UNDER BANKING COMPANIES (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS) ACT, 1970, THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER, VIDYANAGAR BRANCH, MANDYA, KARNATAKA-571401. 2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER BANK OF BARODA, VIDYANAGAR BRANCH, MANDYA, KARNATAKA-571401. …RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35853 WP No. 4825 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Binisha R., counsel on behalf of Sri.Hariprasad M.B., for the petitioners appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioners shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35853 WP No. 4825 of 2026 Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15