209 KULDEEP SINGH STATE OF CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. 1. last two previous occasions. 2. press the present is not interested in pursuing the present 3. 4. 09-07-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.25676 of 2018 Date of Decision : KULDEEP SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL None for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last two previous occasions. Today also, none has appeared on behalf of the press the present petition hence, it can be safely presumed that the is not interested in pursuing the present petition Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH G NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.25676 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.07.2026 ........Petitioner VERSUS ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. (Oral) There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the Today also, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner hence, it can be safely presumed that the petitioner petition. prosecution. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE / reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the petitioner to petitioner ) SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.10 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document