KONDAIA ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED v. The State Tax officer
WP/17620/2026 · 2026-06-03
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28079 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28079 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 17620 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 17620 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.18929 & 18930 of 2026 Kondaia Engineering Company Private Limited 3 / 119 A Pollachi Road, Myleripalayam, Coimbatore 641 032 Represented by its Director, Amirtham ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax officer Podanur Circle, Coimbatore ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in the file of the Respondents and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and devoid of merit of the Respondent impugned order dated 03.10.2023 with reference number GSTIN 33AABCK2630E1Z6 / 2021-22 passed under section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act (Act) along with the summary order dated 03.10.2023 with reference number ZD3310230035832 (impugned order) insofar as the Petitioner herein is concerned. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 17620 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr. G. Sudhakar For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Gokulraj, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** ORDER An order dated 03.10.2023 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.L.Gokulraj, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed long after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 100% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 100% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 17620 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 100% of the disputed tax demand. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
03-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The State Tax officer Podanur Circle, Coimbatore https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 17620 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 17620 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.18929 & 18930 of 2026 03-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis