Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28078 (JHR)

BIRJU KUMAR @ BIRJU TURI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9385/2026 · 2026-10-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:30013 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9385 of 2026 ------ Birju Kumar @ Birju Turi, aged about 23 years, son of Arjun Turi, resident of Village Pachamba, P.O.-Dhangai, P.S.-Dhangai, District- Gaya, State-Bihar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 07-10-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No. 389 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. This is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail. Earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 18.06.2026 in B.A. No.2776 of 2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted mobile phone of the petitioner and another person accompanying him. It is next submitted that the fresh ground is that, in the meanwhile, the informant has been examined as PW-01 and in para-02 of his deposition, it has categorically been mentioned that the PW-01 could not identify the petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-10 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.12.2025 as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No. 389 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 07/10/2026 Abhiraj/