WP Nos. 17404 & 17411 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP Nos. 17404 & 17411 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.18672, 18666 & 18667 of 2026 Star Granites Represented by its Proprietor Rizwan Shamohmed Sahib, S.No.84-84/1, Jagadevi Palayam, Barugur Taluk, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu- 635 109 ..Petitioner(s) in both WP’s Vs 1. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Krishnagiri -II, Assessment Circle, Hosur, Tamil Nadu. 2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Commercial Taxes Building, Hosur, Tamil Nadu ..Respondent(s) in both WP’s PRAYER in W.P.No.17404 of 2026: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the files of the 1st Respondent herein in GSTIN/33AKHPR1671F1Z8/2021-22 in FORM GST DRC-07 in Order Reference No. ZD331125126534R dated 08.11.2025 and quash the same. PRAYER in W.P.No.17411 of 2026: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos. 17404 & 17411 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 records on the files of the 2nd Respondent herein in FORM GST APL-02 in reference no. ZD330226248169C dated 27.02.2026 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): in both WP’s Mr.Siri Chandana. K For Respondent(s): in both WP’s Mr.L.Gokulraj, Government Counsel (Tax) ********* COMMON ORDER An order-in-original dated 08.11.2025 and an appellate order dated 27.02.2026 are assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.L.Gokulraj, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order-in-original, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand, after taking into account the pre deposit made while https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos. 17404 & 17411 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 filing the appeal. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving credit to the pre deposit made while filing the appeal, the impugned order-in-original is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 6. The writ petitions are disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 03-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To 1. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Krishnagiri -II, Assessment Circle, Hosur, Tamil Nadu. 2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Commercial Taxes Building, Hosur, Tamil Nadu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos. 17404 & 17411 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP Nos. 17404 & 17411 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.18672, 18666 & 18667 of 2026 03-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis