Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28061 (AP)

THOTA SOMANNA DORA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2179/2026 · 2026-01-27

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010718242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 2179/2026 Between: 1. THOTA SOMANNA DORA, S/O. RAMA RAO , AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 3-80 , P.VEMAVARAM (P.O), SAMARLAKOTA MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA 3. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SAMARLAKOTA MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5. RAJ A KOSIREDDY GURUMURTHY NAIDU, S/O NOT KNOWN, R/O. D.NO.27-1, KALVA VILLAGE, THANE DISTRICT, MAHARASHTRA STATE- 400605 6. 6. KOSIREDDY GAYATRI DEVI, W/O. RAJA GURUMURTHY NAIDU, R/O. D.NO.27-1, KALVA VILLAGE, THANE DISTRICT, MAHARASHTRA STATE- 40060 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased toPleased to issueA a writ of declaration or a Writ in the nature of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction holding and declaring that the Tahsildar, Respondent No.4 lacking jurisdiction under the provisions of AP Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 to entertain an application either to review or alter the mutation already made Consequently refrain the Respondent No.4 from causing enquiry to alter the mutation made in favour of Writ Petitioner in respect of land in Sy. 69/2 and 69/3 to an extent Ac. 1.35 cents of P.Vemavaram Village, Samarlakota Mandal, Kakinada District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to restrain Respondent No. 4 from conducting an inquiry to alter the mutation entries made in favor of the Petitioner regarding land in Survey Nos. 69/2 and 69/3, measuring Ac. 1.35 cents in P. Vemavaram Village, Samarlakota Mandal, Kakinada District, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SESIBUSHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 28.01.2026 SCH 4 237 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN W.P.No.2179 of 2026 Date: 28.01.2026 SCH