Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35416 RSA No. 1756 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1756 OF 2019 BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. NAGAMANI W/O K.S. PANDAYAN AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
2.
SRI. K.P SRIDHAR S/O K.S. PANDAYAN AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
3.
SRI.K.P. SHESHI S/O K.S. PANDAYAN AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS
4.
SRI.K.P. SHARATH S/O K.S. PANDAYAN AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT 1ST CROSS, JAYANAGARA, KOLAR 563102.
…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S VISWESWARAIAH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. K V MUNINARAYANA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/A NO.32/A/92, OPP VISHAL FORM HOUSE,
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35416 RSA No. 1756 of 2019
SUSHEELA MAIN ROAD, DODAMAVALLI, BENGALURU 560 004. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VISHWANATHA K., ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.12.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.124/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.08.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.102/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR.TRIAL COURT DISMISSED THE SUIT AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Parties present. Compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC is filed.
2. Contents of the compromise petition read over to the parties. Parties agree that the terms of the compromise petition depict true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of the compromise petition.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35416 RSA No. 1756 of 2019
3. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to dispose of the appeal placing the compromise petition on record.
4. Hence, the following;
ORDER (i) The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (ii) Office is directed to pass modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. (iii) Refund of permissible court fee ordered.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 96