Khemraj Dansena v. Jitendra Kumar Nirala jitendra Nirala
MAC/1231/2016 · 2026-07-19
Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28056 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28056 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010139862016
2026:CGHC:30788
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1231 of 2016 1 - Khemraj Dansena S/o Tejram Dansena, Aged About 44 Years R/o Tundra, Police Station And Tahsil- Dabhra, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ................Non-Applicant
... Appellant versus 1 - Jitendra Kumar Nirala (Jitendra Nirala) S/o Bharat Lal Nirala, Aged About 24 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Parsabhatha, Balco Nagar, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh .................Claimant
... Respondent
For Appellant : None For Respondent : Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Order On Board 20/07/2026
1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed against the impugned award dated 05.05.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Korba, CG in Motor Accident Claim Case No.58/2015.
2. On the previous date of hearing, i.e., 29.04.2026, there was no BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.07.22 10:23:36 +0530
2 representation on behalf of the appellant.
3. Today, when the matter was called for hearing, there was again no representation on behalf of the appellant, which shows that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal.
4. Hence, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
5. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE
Khatai