Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28049 (KAR)

ELECTRONICS AND CONTROLS POWER SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WeP PERIPHERALS LIMITED

OSA/5/2026 · 2026-07-14

Jayant Banerji, Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35658-DB O.S.A. No.5/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO.5/2026 BETWEEN: ELECTRONICS AND CONTROLS POWER SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.29/A, 2ND PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU - 560 058 REP. HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. SIVASANKARAN M.S. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SIVARAMAKRISHNAN M. SIVSANKARAN, ADV.,) AND: WeP PERIPHERALS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.40/1A, BASAPPA COMPLEX LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35658-DB O.S.A. No.5/2026 REP. BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AND COMPANY SECRETARY SRI. M. SARAVAN. …RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 READ WITH SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN COMPANY PETITION NO.166/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE. ALLOW THE PRESENT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 01.06.2026 PASSED BY THE LEARNED COMPANY JUDGE ADMITTING THE WINDING UP PETITION IN CO.P.166/2010 AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35658-DB O.S.A. No.5/2026 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) A memo for withdrawal has been filed today by the learned counsel for the appellant stating that the order of admission of the company petition has been recalled and the company petition is restored for de novo consideration. It is stated that the instant appeal is rendered infructuous. This appeal is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications shall stand dismissed. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8