ELECTRONICS AND CONTROLS POWER SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WeP PERIPHERALS LIMITED
OSA/5/2026 · 2026-07-14
Jayant Banerji, Vijaykumar A Patil
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28049 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28049 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35658-DB O.S.A. No.5/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO.5/2026
BETWEEN:
ELECTRONICS AND CONTROLS POWER SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.29/A, 2ND PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU - 560 058 REP. HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. SIVASANKARAN M.S. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SIVARAMAKRISHNAN M. SIVSANKARAN, ADV.,)
AND:
WeP PERIPHERALS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.40/1A, BASAPPA COMPLEX LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35658-DB O.S.A. No.5/2026
REP. BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AND COMPANY SECRETARY SRI. M. SARAVAN. …RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 READ WITH SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN COMPANY PETITION NO.166/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE. ALLOW THE PRESENT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 01.06.2026 PASSED BY THE LEARNED COMPANY JUDGE ADMITTING THE WINDING UP PETITION IN CO.P.166/2010 AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35658-DB O.S.A. No.5/2026
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
A memo for withdrawal has been filed today by the
learned counsel for the appellant stating that the order of admission of the company petition has been recalled and the company petition is restored for de novo consideration. It is stated that the instant appeal is rendered infructuous.
This appeal is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Pending applications shall stand dismissed.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8