Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28045 (JHR)

SHAHBAZ ANSARI ALIAS SAHBAZ ANSARI ALIAS CHHOTU ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9257/2026 · 2026-10-05

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:29679] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9257 of 2026 ------ 1. Shahbaz Ansari @ Sahbaz Ansari @ Chhotu Ansari, aged about 18 years, S/o Late Muslim Ansari, R/o Village- Belgoria Colony, Near Shiv Mandir Mohribandh Jhariya, P.O. & P.S. Jharia, District- Dhanbad 2. Rohit Kumar Rajak aged about 20 years, S/o Upender Rajak, R/o Karmatand BCCL Colony, Golden Pahari Mukunda, P.O. & P.S. Tisra, District Dhanbad .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-05-10-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Saraidhela P.S. Case No.126 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 304(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners snatched the bag of the informant and made her fell down from the auto- rickshaw in which she was travelling. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting them on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph-09 of the instant bail application, charge-sheet has been submitted against them. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 29.06.2026 as has been mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Dhanbad in connection with Saraidhela P.S. Case No.126 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-05.10.2026-Animesh/