Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28041 (KAR)

G. K. DIVAKARA v. M/S. SHRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED

WP/6993/2024 · 2026-07-14

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35582 WP No. 6993 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 6993 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. G.K.DIVAKARA, S/O. SRI. LATE KRISHNACHAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 2. SRI. UDAY H.D., S/O. SRI. G.K.DIVAKARA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 3. SMT. LATHA C.R., W/O. SRI G.K.DIVAKARA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O. 2849/1, SITE NO.2, SATHYAMANGALA, VIVEK NAGARA, NEAR MASTER COLLEGE ROAD, HASSAN-573201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SUMANTH L.BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. SHRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE, LEVEL 3, WOCKHARDT TOWERS, EAST WING, C-2, G BLOCK, BANDRA-KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35582 WP No. 6993 of 2024 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER MR. PRASHANTH B.B., 2. M/S. SHRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE LTD., REGISTERD OFFICE NO.123, ANGAPPA NAICKEN STREET, CHENNAI-600001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER 3. M/S. SHRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE LTD., BRANCH OFFICE NO.96, R.B. MANOR, 20TH MAIN ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, 2ND BLOCK, BENGALUR-560 010. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER MR. PRASHANTH B.B., …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. LOKESH K.V., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Srinivas V., counsel on behalf of Sri.Sumanth L.Bharadwaj., for petitioners appeared in person and Sri.Lokesh K.V., counsel for respondent appeared through video conferencing. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35582 WP No. 6993 of 2024 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the dismissal of the petition as not pressed and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25