1 APHC010718232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 339/2026 Between: 1. GHANTA VENKATA RAMANA, W/O LATE GHANTA VENKATA RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, OCCUPATION HOMEMAKER, R/O FLAT NO. 103, AHLADA RESIDENCY, 4TH ROAD, NEAR WATER TANK, VETERINARY COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 008. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AMARAVATI. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APCRDA, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. MUSUNURU VISWESWARA RAO, S/O LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, C/O MUSUNURU SUJATHA, R/O H. NO. 3- 45, PEDAPULIPAKA VILLAGE, PENAMULURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI CHALASANI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O CHALASANI NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. OCCUPATION DEVELOPER, R/O NEPPALLI VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL. PRESENTLY RESIDING IN D. NO. 59A-21/4-5/4A, RR GARDENS, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, N.T.R. DISTRICT 5. SRI MANDAVA SASIDHAR, S/O MANDAVA SAMBA SIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. OCCUPATION DEVELOPER, R/O VELAGAPUDI 2 VARI STREET, AYYAPPA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, N.T.R. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT CHALASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Chalasani Venkat, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development and Sri A. Ram Dheeraj, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Smt. S. Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel for APCRDA. 2. Sri Chalasani Venkat, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the Writ Petitioner has filed a Suit for Partition only yesterday i.e., on 06.01.2026 against Sri Musunuru Visweswara Rao (Respondent No.3). In this view of the matter, he seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to pursue the Suit proceedings. 3. Request granted. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 07.01.2026 Vns