Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2804 (CAL)

SUKHDEO MAHATO AND ANR v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/88/2026 · 2026-04-06

Sugato Majumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

145 06.04.2026 Court. No.6 Tapas CRR 88 of 2026 IA NO. CRAN/1/2026 SUKHDEO MAHATO AND ANR. VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. Mr. Mayank Roy … for the petitioner Mr. Abhishek Singh … for the de facto complainant Mr. Nilay Chakraborty Mr. Sagnik Sankar Sikdar … for the State 1. This is an application praying for quashing of criminal proceedings being Siliguri Police Station Case No. 42 of 2018 dated 22.01.2018 under Sections 420/506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 186. Charge Sheet has been submitted being Charge Sheet No. 827 of 2018 dated 27.12.2018, corresponding to G.R. No. 190 of 2018 pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Siliguri, District- Darjeeling. The Learned Counsel for the de facto complainant is present today. 2. It is submitted that both the parties settled the matter amicable. Offences are compoundable in nature. 3. Mr. Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for the State submitted that he has nothing to oppose in this 2 application. Accordingly, the aforesaid prosecution is hereby quashed. 4. The petitioner is released from bail bond. 5. The instant C.R.R. along with application stands disposed of. (Sugato Majumdar, J.)