LAKHINDAR KISKU AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM(M)/1180/2026 · 2026-07-14
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28038 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28038 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
14.07.2026
Sl. No. 469 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(M) 1180 of 2026
In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Habibpur Police Station Case No. 164 of 2017 dated 18.05.2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
-And-
In the matter of: Lakhindar Kisku & Anr. …Petitioners
Mr. Tasmim Ahemed Mr. Sk. Sarfaraj Nawaj …for the Petitioners
Mr. Suraj Mishra …for the State
1. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were earlier granted statutory bail but subsequently, because of non-appearance, warrant of arrest was issued and they have been taken into custody and since then, they have been in custody for 11 months.
3. Learned advocate appearing for the State on the other hand opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioners have misused the bail which was granted. The records reflect that the case is of the year 2017. For 9 years, the case is continuing because of lapses of the present petitioners.
2
4. In view of the conduct of the present petitioners, their prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.
5. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1180 of 2026 is dismissed.
6. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)