Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28034 (AP)

VATSAVI VENKATAPATHI RAJU v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/771/2026 · 2026-02-09

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010717032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 771/2026 Between: 1. VATSAVI VENKATAPATHI RAJU, S/O. NARAYANA RAJU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RIO. 2-76/1A, KRISHNA TEMPLE STREEET, KOWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH-533006. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522503. 2. THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI- 522503. 3. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, 3RD FLOOR, PRIME HILL CHRIST, VADDESWARAM, TADEPALLI-522 501. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAJAHMUNDRY EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533001. 5. THE KOWUR MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KOVVUR MUNICIPALITY, KOVVUR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT- 534530. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, 2 RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT- 533101 7. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT- 533101. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI,STANDING COUNSEL FOR MUNICIPALITIES 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for MAUD, Ms. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning and Ms. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities. 2. Ms. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Kovvur Municipality, dated 09.02.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the Respondents have not issued any kind of direction or order to the petitioner to render the service as indicated in the writ petition. 4. Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the Proceedings of the Commissioner, 3 Kovvur Municipality to the Executive Engineer (Public Health Division), West Godavari District, Eluru, dated 07.11.2015 listing out certain works to be executed and seeking sanction. 5. It is noticed by this Court, even if the claim of the Petitioner were to be agreed, this Writ Petition is hopelessly barred by delay and latches and on perusal of the Affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition, this Court finds that no justification has been offered and the delay and latches have not been explained by the Petitioner at all. 6. In this view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the present Writ Petition is hopelessly barred by delay and latches and there remains no cause of action. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. 8. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 10.02.2026 DSV 4 167 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 771/2026 10.02.2026 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 771/2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 10.02.2026 GRKP, J Writ Petition is dismissed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV 6