MADISETTY VENKATA SURESH BABU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/143/2026 · 2026-01-05
D Ramesh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28033 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28033 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010716532025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 143/2026 Between:
1. MADISETTY VENKATA SURESH BABU, S/O.KOTESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE DOOR NO. 2- 249, BRAMHARAO PETA, BADAPURAM DONAKONDA MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REGISTRATION BHAVAN GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521225
3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 523001
4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, DARSI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 523247
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ
Order or orders, Direction to declare the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in Draft Memo No. G2/19134/2011 dt.01-12-2011 as illegal, without
2
jurisdiction and Unconstitutional and to issued consequential direction to the 4th respondent to receive and register the document that may be presented by the petitioners for registration in respect of the House site for an extent of Ac.0-15 cents out of extent of Ac. 01-00 cents in Sy. No. 211/1, situated in Badapuram village, Donakonda Grampanchayat, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam District, without reference to the memo of the 2nd respondent bearing No. G2/19134/2011 dt.01-12-2011 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to receive and register the documents that may be presented by the petitioners for registration in respect of the House site for an extent of Ac. 0-15 cents out of extent of Ac. 01-00 cents in Sy. No. 211/1, situated in Badapuram village, Donakonda Grampanchayat, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam District, without reference to the memo of the 2nd respondent bearing No. 62/19134/2011 dt.01-12-2011 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATESWARLU GADA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-
“….to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,
order or direction, declaring the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in Draft Memo No. G2/19134/2011 dated 01-12- 2011 as illegal, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional; and consequently to issue a direction to the 4th Respondent to receive and register the document that may be presented by the petitioners for registration in respect of the house site admeasuring Ac.0-15 cents out of a total extent of Ac.1-00 cent in Sy. No. 211/1, situated at Badapuram Village, Donakonda Gram Panchayat, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam District, without reference to the memo of the 2nd Respondent bearing No. G2/19134/2011 dated 01-12-2011, and to pass…”
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner straight away takes this Court through the order, dated 30.01.2020, passed by this Court in W.P.No.1981 of 2020 as the facts and circumstances of this case are similar to that of this case.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader does not refute the submission that the said order covers the matter before this Court in this writ petition.
4
5. Relevant paragraphs of the order passed in W.P.No.1981 of 2020 are extracted hereunder:
“The main ground urged by this petitioner is that when the document is presented for registration, rejection of the same based on the draft Memo No.G2/19134/2011, dated 01.12.2011 with District Registrar, Ongole vide Endorsement No.G1/1382/2011, dated 09.12.2011. The memo was issued in view of the injunction orders passed by the High Court of Madras. The Madras High Court directed based on a letter from Rev.B.M.Sudheer to the Inspector General of Stamps and Registration, State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad not to register any deeds of conveyance by any of the parties to any of the parties in respect of the properties covered under the scheme. But, the order was not communicated to Registrar except the letter of Rev.B.M.Sudheer to the District Registrar, who in turn issued such direction.
According to the order under challenge under Section 71 of the Registration Act, refusal to register a document on the memo issued by Tahsildar or any other officer is illegal in view of the judgments of the Division Bench in P.Narasimha Reddy v. Sub-Registrar, Shameerpeta Mandal, Ranga Reddy District1 and S.Nagi Reddy v. Joint Registrar, Tirupati2. Therefore, the
order impugned in this writ petition is contrary to the law declared by the Division Bench and also another judgment of single Judge in W.P.No.10721 of 2016, dated 01.04.2016, W.P.No.34689 of 2012, dated 12.12.2012. Hence, the impugned proceedings are hereby set aside while directing the 4th respondent to receive and register, if it is not prohibited by any order or law, the document
5
by following the principles laid down in the judgments referred supra.”
6. Following the said order, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms thereof, directing the 4th respondent to receive and register the document presented by the petitioner for registration in respect of the house site admeasuring Ac.0-15 cents out of a total extent of Ac.1-00 cent in Sy. No. 211/1, situated at Badapuram Village, Donakonda Gram Panchayat, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam District.
7. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH
6th January, 2026 cbn
6
385 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
Writ Petition No.143 of 2026
6th January, 2026 cbn