TUSHAR SINHA @ TUSHAR KUMAR SINHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9262/2026 · 2026-10-05
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28029 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28029 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:29688 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9262 of 2026
------ Tushar Sinha @ Tushar Kumar Sinha, aged about 22 years, son of Kumad Sinha @ Kumod Sinha @ Kumud Kumar Sinha, resident of Village-Pundoul, P.O.-Barkagaon, P.S.-Barkagaon, Dist.-Hazaribag … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nawin Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 05.10.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.58 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 109(1)/ 118(2)/111(2)(b)/326(f)/324(5)/308(3)/308(4)/351(3)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner demanded extortion and attempted to kill the informant by firing upon him and sprinkled petrol and set the vehicle on fire and when the informant tried to flee away, they shot at him and the informant also sustained burn injuries. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him on T.I. Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph no.09 of the bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is then submitted that no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 05 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during
the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribagh, in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.58 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
05.10.2026 Gunjan-