APHC010717322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 303/2026 Between: 1. MR. YERRAM NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT. YEARS, S/O. YERRAM MANIKYAM, R/O. 5-60-2/208, ASHOK NAGAR,4/1, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GHXG PLUSGPF 0PP. S GRAND RESTAURANT, ONE CENTER, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 521225. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR. 4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR. 5. THE SUBREGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, NALLAPADU,. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR. 8. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, GUNTUR WEST. 2 9. SRI SARVESWARA SWAMY DEVASTHANAM, PEDAPALAKALURU VILLAGE, NALLAPADU DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 and 3 in not considering my Representation dt. 23.10.2025 to exclude my property i.e Ac. 1.00 Cents in S No 426 of Pedapalakaluru Village, Nallapadu Division, Guntur District, from Endowment properties list and issue a letter to the registration department to the same effect as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct Respondent No. 1, 2 and Respondent No. 3 to forthwith decide on my Representation dated 23-10- 2025, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRUDVI RAJU MUDUNURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following Order: Heard Sri Prudhvi Raju Mudunuri, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments and Sri Kappera Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.9-Temple. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is against the respondents in not disposing of the representation of the petitioner, dated 21.04.2025 which was filed under the PGRS Grievance Portal. 3 3. It has been stated that pursuant to the said representation, the report of the Executive Officer was called for by the Assistant Commissioner. Accordingly, the Executive Officer has submitted his report on 02.05.2025. However, so far, the respondent No.2 has not passed any orders on the said representation. 4. Having regard to the above and submissions made, this Court is of the view that pursuant to the grievance of petitioner, since the respondent authorities have already called for a report, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondent No.2 to pass orders in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 06.01.2026 MSI 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 303/2026 Dated: 06.01.2026 MSI