Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28025 (CHH)

PRANSHU BAIS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/817/2025 · 2026-07-20

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010052362025 2026:CGHC:31003 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 817 of 2025 1 - Pranshu Bais S/o Shri Pramod Bais Aged About 30 Years Member Of Seva Sarkari Samiti Maryadit Village Bahmu (Samiti) Registration No. 124 ) Akaltari Tahsil Lakhram District - Bilaspur) R/o Village Akaltari P/o Lakhram Tahsil Beltara District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Cooperative Societies Mahanadi Bhawan Nawa Raippur Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Registrar Cooperative Societies 3rd Floor Block - 2 Indravati Bhawan Nawa Raipur Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies Division Bilaspur Composite Building Near Collectorate Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies Building Bilaspur Composite Building Near Collectorate Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Primary Seva Sarkari Samiti Maryadit Village Bahmu (Registration No. 124) Akaltari Through Its Manager Tahsil Belatra District - Bilaspur (C.G.) VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 6 - Smt. Sanyogita Kashyap W/o Rajendra Kashyap Aged About 40 Years R/o Vill. Akaltari P.O. Lakhram Tahsil Bilha District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Advocate For State :- Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. For Respondents No. 5 & 6:- Mr. R.L. Rajak, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 21.07.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. He further submits that liberty be granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition in accordance with law, in case any exigency arises in future. 3. The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha