Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28020 (PNJ)

RAM LUBHAYA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/1925/2018 · 2026-07-10

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[235-2] Ram Lubhaya State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] to press the present writ petition. [2] the present writ petition is [3] disposed off 10.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1925 Date of Decision : Ram Lubhaya versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Krishan Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press the present writ petition. In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. 10.07.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1925-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.07.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate Mr. Harpreet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, dismissed as withdrawn. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.10 17:10 I agree to specified portions of this document