Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2802 (PAT)

Tananjay Prakash v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/5805/2026 · 2026-04-20

Partha Sarthy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5805 of 2026 ====================================================== Tananjay Prakash, Son of Surendra Ram, Resident of Village-Harpur Rewari, Block-Ujiyarpur, P.S -Angaraghat, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary Panchayati Raj Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner Cum District Water and Cleaning Committee, Samastipur. 5. The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Samastipur. 6. The Block Development Officer, Ujiyarpur, Samastipur. 7. Subodh Das Son of Nanhaki Das, Resident of Village -Harpur Rewari, Ward No.10, P.S -Angaraghat, District -Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate Mr. Ravinesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Satya Vrat, AC to GP-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 20-04-2026 The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief :- “That, this is an application for issuance of the appropriate writ/writs, order/orders or direction/directions to the respondent Authority to Select the petitioner on the Post of Sanitation Supervisor –Cum– Supervisor under Gram Panchayat Harpur, Bock- Ujiyarpur, District;-Samastipur after Cancellation of the Selection of the respondents No.7, who has been illegally and arbitrary Selected on the Post of Sanitation Supervisor Patna High Court CWJC No.5805 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026 2/2 cum Supervisor in the aforesaid Panchayat.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of the petitioner having filed a representation, a copy of which has been brought on record as Annexure-P5 to the writ application before the Deputy Development Commissioner – cum– District Water and Cleaning Committee (respondent no.4), no relief has been granted to the petitioner nor has the petitioner received any response thereto. 3. Let the petitioner file a fresh representation along with a copy of this order within a period of four weeks before the respondent no.4. 4. The respondent no.4 shall decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months and communicate the result thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 5. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations and directions. avinash/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U