Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:6280 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 2649 of 2026 Decided on : 09.03.2026 Govind Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Hirdaya Ram, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.3, respectively.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case representation (Annexure P- 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:6280 14), filed by him, be decided by the Authority concerned, within some reasonable time.
3. The petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction that let the representation (Annexure P-14) of the petitioner be decided by the Authority concerned, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order, within a period of 8 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand
disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
March 09, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)