Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010027452026 2026:GAU-AS:3840 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/356/2026 SAIN UDDIN SON OF LT. MAJAMAT ALI RESIDENT OF VILL- JAWKATADIA, P.S. BOKO,IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP, ASSAM, PH. NO. 8638231119 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P A AHMED, MR M HOQUE Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 16-03-2026 Heard Mr. P.A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the accused applicant, and Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Page No.# 2/3 Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in connection with Boko P.S. Case No. 02/2026 registered under Section 75(2)/78(2)/329(4)/74/76/64(1)/62/304(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The case relates to the allegations of sexual harassment and criminal intimidation by the accused applicant, along with others, against the informant. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the allegations are false and have been made in the context of dispute over ancestral property. It is also submitted that the accused nos. 4 and 5 have been granted bail by this Court. 6 (six) persons are named in the FIR and the present petitioner has been named as accused no. 1. 5. The main allegation is that after the death of her husband, the petitioner started disturbing her in an improper manner and thereafter, when she showed some electronic materials regarding the same to their neighbours, he along with the other accused persons forced their way into the house and assaulted her. 6. The case diary has been received. 7. The learned Additional PP while opposing the bail submits that the investigation lends support to the allegations of the FIR and in her statement the victim has supported her allegations. 8. I have perused the relevant portion of the Case Diary. Page No.# 3/3 9. The allegations against the accused person who have been granted bail stand on a somewhat different footing. 10.In view of the allegations and implications against the present petitioner and the support to it lent by the investigating materials and considering that the present bail is by way of anticipatory bail, I do not find sufficient merit in the bail petition. 11.Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition stands rejected, at this stage. 12 Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant