Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28014 (PNJ)

CHARANJIT SINGH ALIAS CHARANJIT SINGH PADAM v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/64792/2025 · 2026-07-09

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-64792-2026(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 327 CRM-M-64792-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 09.07.2026 Charanjit Singh alias Charanjit Singh Padam … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Hitesh Chopra, Advocate, and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jasdeep Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. Dalip Kataria, Advocate, for respondent No.2. *** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL) 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of the below detailed First Information Report (FIR), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 27.08.2025(P-2), effected between the parties. DETAILS OF CRIMINAL CASE:- FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station 177 20.11.2019 379-B, 452, 392, 149 IPC Mataur, District SAS Nagar 2. The present case pertains to the offence of snatching and, therefore, the provisions of Sections 379-B and 392 IPC are attracted. Such offences, being crimes against society, cannot be permitted to be brought to RAJAN 2026.07.10 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-64792-2026(O&M) 2 an end merely on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the private parties. 3. Accordingly, petition stands dismissed. ( Sanjay Vashisth ) Judge 09.07.2026 Rajan Whether speaking / reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RAJAN 2026.07.10 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document