Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28013 (CHH)

AJAY SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5189/2026 · 2026-07-19

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010253042026 2026:CGHC:30620 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5189 of 2026 1 - Ajay Singh S/o Sh. R.I. Singh Aged About 57 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator, Lundra, Distt Surguja, (C.G.) 2 - Ramesh Sharan Singh S/o Rbs Singh Aged About 55 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator Pratappur, Distt. Surajpur (C.G.) 3 - Mahesh Thakur S/o Dp Thakur Aged About 58 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator Batauli, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Mrs. Usha Kiran Baxla D/o Mariyamus Baxla Aged About 52 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator, Udaipur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Arom Baxla S/o Pritam Baxla Aged About 51 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator Sonhat, Distt.- Korea, (C.G.) 6 - Ramesh Kumar Singh S/o Bhuwaneshwar Singh Aged About 57 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 7 - Sanjeev Kumar Bharti S/o Shambhuram Aged About 55 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) 8 - Felix Ekka S/o Vincent Ekka Aged About 58 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator, Kusmi, Block Shankargarh, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 9 - Stephan Xalxo S/o Vincent Xalxo Aged About 57 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator Ramchandrapur, Distt- Surguja (C.G.) AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.07.22 10:47:48 +0530 2 10 - Om Shankar Singh S/o Shiv Prasad Singh Aged About 57 Years Presently Posted As Block Resource Coordinator Khadgawan, Distt.- Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) 11 - Sohansai Ekka S/o Rambaran Aged About 56 Years P/o Block Resource Coordinator Wadrafnagar, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction (Dpi), Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mission Director Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (Formerly Ssa), Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Project Coordinator Samagra Shiksha, District Surguja (C.G.) 6 - District Project Coordinator Samagra Shiksha, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Dy.G.A. For Respondents/Samagra : Mr. Anadi Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 20/07/2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners, who are working in the department of respondents/Samagra Shiksha are seeking a direction towards the respondents authorities to regularize 3 their services on the post of Block Resource Coordinator (BRC). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been in continuous service since 17.01.1996, i.e., for nearly three decades. It is further submitted that the concerned department has already sought the approval and concurrence of the Finance Department for the regularization of the petitioners on their respective posts. However, the petitioners' claim/representations for regularization have not yet been decided by the competent authority. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State as well as respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submits that, if the petitioners' claim/representation (Annexure P-7) is still pending before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided by passing a necessary order, in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents. 5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to consider and decide the petitioners' claim/representation by passing a necessary order, in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4 6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep