Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2801 (CAL)

MAITREYEE GOSWAMI v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

CRR/55/2026 · 2026-03-02

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.03.2026 Ct. No.6 D/L 100 Mujahid In The High Court At Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction CRR 55 of 2026 In the matter of: Maitreyee Goswami ….Petitioner Mr. Satarudriya Mukherjee Ms. Tannu Agarwal …for the petitioner Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, Ld. APP Mr. Kallol Acharjee (VC) …for the State 1. Affidavit of service has been filed, let it be taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the opposite party no.2 could not be served for want of sufficient address. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is the complainant and has filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. A prayer has been made for the expeditious trial. 4. The court considers that if appropriate direction is passed for expeditious trial it will not prejudice either of the parties. 5. In the circumstances, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, 3rd Court at Sliliguri Sub-Divisional Court is directed to ensure expeditious trial and disposal of CR Case 357 of 2019 filed under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in accordance with the law. 6. CRR 55 of 2026 stands disposed of. 2 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all usual requisite formalities. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)