Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28004 (KAR)

M/S SIDDHIVINAYAKA ENTERPRISES v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7033/2026 · 2026-07-09

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34967 WP No. 7033 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 7033 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. SIDDHIVINAYAKA ENTERPRISES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT 56, MEZZANINE FLOOR, POPULAR ARCADE, TATA ROAD NO.1, OPERA HOUSE, GIRGAON, MUMBAI - 400004, REPRESENTED BY PARTNER, ANMOL SINGH SETHI …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHESHA KARTHIK M REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE DETECTIVE POLICE INSPECTOR AND INVESTIGATION OFFICER, FIU DIVISION, CID BENGALURU, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP) Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34967 WP No. 7033 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 528 OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIKA SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 PRAYING TO QUASHING AND/OR SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 12.02.2026 BEARING NO. CRIME/01/FIU/CID/2026 ISSUED U/S. 94 OF THE BNSS BY THE RESPONDENT IN RELATION TO FIR IN CRIME NO.633/2025, DATED 18.12.2025 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 318(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 339, 340(2) AND 61(2) OF BNS, 2023, WHEREBY DEFREEZE THE PETITIONERS BANK ACCOUNT NO. 59223071998000 MAINTAINED WITH THE HDFC BANK LIMITED, THAKUR VILLAGE BRANCH, KANDIVALI, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA AND ACCOUNT NO. 318801010338293 MAINTAINED WITH THE UNION BANK OF INDIA, OPERA HOUSE BRANCH, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA HAS BEEN DEBIT FROZEN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioner in the above case humbly submit that, the present Writ Petition was preferred seeking a prayer to de-freeze the bank accounts of the Petitioner, as the Investigation Officer had communicated the banks to debit freeze the entire bank account. However, the Investigation Officer has once again informed the bank to mark lien to a particular amount in the Petitioner's bank account. In view of the same the present petition would not survive. Therefore, the Petitioner most humbly seeks the permission of this Hon'ble court to withdraw the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34967 WP No. 7033 of 2026 present writ petition and accord liberty to challenge the direction of marking of the lien. The memo may kindly be taken on record in the interest of justice." 2. Liberty so sought is granted. In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 22