BALDEV DAS @ BALDEV MAHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8227/2026 · 2026-10-07
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28002 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28002 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:30056
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8227 of 2026
Baldev Das @ Baldev Mahra, Aged about 33 years, Son of Hriday Das, Resident of Village Bhero, P.O & P.S.-Pathrol, District- Deoghar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. PP
---
04/07.10.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.71 of 2026, registered under Sections 319(2), 318 (4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 61(2) of BNS Act 2023 and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of IT Act (Amendment Act), 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber – Crime – Special Court, Deoghar.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 11.05.2026. Charge sheet has already been submitted. He submits that 1 mobile phone and 3 SIM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, which as per his information is standing in the name of the petitioner/family members. It is submitted that no crime link has been found and no victim has been identified.
4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to
2026:JHHC:30056
2
be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber – Crime – Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.71 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.10.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:08.10.2026