ABINASH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT OF HOME, RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.)/599/2026 · 2026-10-05
Akhil Kumar, Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28000 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28000 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:29790-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) (DB) No.599 of 2026 ----- Abinash Kumar, S/o Sriu Chhote Lal Das, Aged about 36 years, R/o At Dighra PO-Goura, PS-Laxmipur, Dist-Jamui, Bihar 811312.
… … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Ranchi, PO-Dhurva, PS- Jagannathpur, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand.
2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Jharkhand Police HQ, DPRD Building, HEC Dhurva, PO-Dhurva, PS- Jagannathpur, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand.
3. Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad, PO, PS – Dhanbad, Dist. – Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
4. Sunita Kumari. W/o Abinash Kumar Presently Residing at C/o Rohit Kumar, East Basuriya, Coal Dump, Block No.8, Quarter no. 90, PO-Bhuli, PS- East Basuriya Tetulmari, Dist- Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
5. Minor child Aviram Aarya, Aged about 11 years, S/o Abinash Kumar, Presently Residing at C/o Rohit Kumar, East Basuriya, Coal Dump, Block No. 8 Quarter no. 90, Po- Bhuli, PS- East Basuriya Tetulmari, Dist- Dhanbad, Jharkhand (Represented through Respondent No. 4).
6. Minor child Avantika Rani, Aged About 4 years, D/o Abinash Kumar, Presently Residing at C/o Rohit Kumar, East Basuriya, Coal Dump, Block No. 8, Quarter no. 90, PO- Bhuli, PS- East Basuriya Tetulmari, Dist- Dhanbad, Jharkhand (Represented through Respondent No. 4)
… … Respondents `-------
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR ------- For the Appellant : Mr. Jeetendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Shubham Gautam, AC to AAG-V ------
Order No. 02/Dated 5th October, 2026
1. After some argument, Mr. Jeetendra Kumar Mishra,
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition. However, he has sought for liberty to search out the remedy for redressal of grievance.
2026:JHHC:29790-DB
2
2. Such submission has been made in presence of
learned counsel for the State.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, reserving liberty to the petitioner to search out the remedy for redressal of the grievance which is the subject matter of the present case.
4. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Akhil Kumar, J.) Date : 5th October, 2026 Birendra/