Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2800 (BOM)

M/S SANJEEVAN VIDYALAYA TRUST v. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

WP/2169/2026 · 2026-06-17

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

P1-2169-2026-WP-C=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2169 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2171 OF 2026 Sanjeevan Vidyalaya Trust … Petitioner Versus The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner … Respondent …………. Ms. Bhargavi D. Patil a/w Neev R. Patil for the Petitioner. Ms. Smita Thakur (through VC) for the Respondent …………. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 19th JUNE, 2026 P. C. : . The motion for speaking to the minutes to the common order dated 17th June 2026. 2. It is brought to my notice that the bank accounts of the petitioner – Trust have already been attached by Notice dated 18.03.2026, which is already placed on record. 3. As the petitioner – Trust has undertaken to make payment in respect of the interest, the accounts needs to be defreezed. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection for Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2026.06.22 10:18:21 +0530 P1-2169-2026-WP-C=.doc removing the attachment. 5. In that view of the matter, following para No.7 shall be added. “7. The bank accounts of the petitioner – Trust shall stand defreezed.” 6. After carrying out necessary corrections, the corrected order be uploaded on the website. 7. Motion is disposed of. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) Uday S. Jagtap 2 of 2