NITESH GANJHU @ PANDU GANJHU @ JITENDRA GANJHU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./12018/2025 · 2026-03-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 280 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 280 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:6145 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 12018 of 2025
------ Nitesh Ganjhu @ Pandu Ganjhu @ Jitendra Ganjhu, aged about 30 years, son of Birju Ganjhu, resident of Village Gudgudiya, P.O. & P.S. –Lawalong, District –Chatra.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.03 Dated- 09.03.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.12 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under sections 25 (1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in extremist activities. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the statement of the co- accused –Sikandar Ganjhu. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.08.2025 as has been mentioned in para -1 of the bail application. It is then submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named
petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Latehar, in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.12 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
09.03.2026
Sonu/