Heisnam Premchandra Singh v. State of Manipur and 2 Ors
MC(WP(C))/73/2026 · 2026-02-01
Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
MC(WP(C)) No. 73 of 2026 Contd…/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WP(C)) No. 73 of 2026 (Ref:- WP(C) No. 330 of 2024) Heisnam Premchandra Singh
… Applicant Vs.
State of Manipur & ors.
… Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH O R D E R 02-02-2026
Heard Ms. Julekha Khan, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. Th. Vashum, learned GA appearing for the respondents.
The present application has been filed with the prayer for correcting the typographical mistake occurred at paras 3, 4 and 5 of the order dated 21-01-2026 passed by this court in WP(C) No. 330 of 2024.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that at paras 3, 4 and 5(i) of the aforesaid order dated 21-01-2026 passed by this court, instead of Department of Education (S), it has been wrongly recorded as Department of SCERT. The learned counsel prays for correcting the said word “SCERT” mentioned in paras 3, 4 and 5(i) of the said order by the word “Education (S)”.
Mr. Th. Vashum, learned GA appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that he has no objection in allowing the said correction.
IN. 48 SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Digitally signed by SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Date: 2026.02.02 18:02:55 +05'30'
MC(WP(C)) No. 73 of 2026 Contd…/-
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is hereby directed that the word “SCERT” appearing in paras 3, 4 and 5(i) of the order dated 21-01-2026 passed by this court in WP(C) No. 330 of 2024 be read as “Education (S)”.
With the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of.
JUDGE Devananda
-2-