IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 88 of 2026 Date of Decision : 24.02.2026 Surbhi Bedi ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner : Mr. Ravinder Singh Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Status report stands filed. Taken on record. It has been submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation. In view of this, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 14.01.2026 is made absolute till the disposal of the trial, subject to the following conditions:- (I) The petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses, nor will he influence any evidence in any manner whatsoever; 2 (II) The petitioner shall attend the trial in case a charge sheet is presented against him and will not seek unnecessary adjournments; (III) The petitioner will not leave the present address for a continuous period of seven days without furnishing the address of the intended visit to the SHO, the Police Station concerned, and the Trial Court, and he will furnish his local address to the concerned Police Station. (IV) The petitioner will surrender his passport, if any, to the Court; and (V) The petitioner will furnish his mobile number and social media contact to the Police and the Court and will abide by the summons/notices received from the Police/Court through SMS/ WhatsApp/ Social Media Account. In case of any change in the mobile number or social media accounts, the same will be intimated to the Police/Court within five days from the date of the change. The petition stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 24th February, 2026 (Nikita)