APHC010719362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 35 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-1 [3552] Vakika Adinarayana ...Appellant Vs. Chenchu Rama Chandrudu and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A Syam Sundar Reddy Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mr. N Chandra Sekhar Reddy for R.1 GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development for R.2, GP for Revenue for R.3 to R.5 GP for Home for R.6 CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 30th January, 2026 P C : The present writ appeal, in our opinion, is totally misconceived as no specific directions were given in the judgment and order impugned in which the learned single Judge categorically held that the petitioner had neither illustrated any instances in the writ petition nor any action initiated by respondent Nos.4 & 5 to prove his cause of action in the present writ petition. It was also held that the petition filed by the petitioner was on mere apprehensions and without any cause of action. 2 HCJ & CGR, J WA_35_2026 2. In our opinion, no cause of action accrued to the appellant herein at all to file the present writ appeal. 3. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J Vjl