APHC010717722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 859/2026 Between: GADE SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, S/O LATE VENKATRRAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 1-2/3, K.GANGAVARAM MANDAL, SUNDARAPALLI, EAST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533306 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. - 522239 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522239. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT 533201 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PAMARRU POLICE STATION, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 521157 5. GADI PALLALAMMA, W/O VENKATRRAO 1-5, K.GANGAVARAM MANDAL, SUNDARAPALLI, EAST GODAVARI ANDHRA PRADESH - 533306. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.859 of 2026 Dated 07.03.2026 D S SIVADARSHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus or Certiorari A Quashing the FIR dated 11.11.2025 registered by the Station House Officer Pamarru Police Station against the petitioner and B Consequently direct respondents 1 to 4 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent or with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject property except in accordance with due process of law and pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. D.V. Sivadarshan, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the dispute between the parties is purely civil in nature and that the police authorities are not interfering in the said civil dispute. 4. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing further survives for consideration in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.859 of 2026 Dated 07.03.2026 As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 07.03.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.859 of 2026 Dated 07.03.2026 41 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 859 of 2026 Date: 07.03.2026 RSI