APHC010715082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 204/2026 Between: 1. KUSAM SIVA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O. KUSAM SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED 34 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.5-81, NAMBURU VILLAGE, PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522509. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P. POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522502. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522004. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDAKAKANI POLICE STATION, PEDAKAKANI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522509. 5. INUGANTI SARALA, C/O. ISRS VENKAT APPAYYA RAO, AGED 74 YEARS, RIO. W-3, VILLA GRANDE, NEAR SACHIVALAYAM, SATRAMPADU, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT- 534007 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 204/2026 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent No.4/police authorities in interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and Respondent No.5 as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, unconstitutional, and contrary to the procedure established by law, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and Respondent No.5 despite shall work out the remedies only before the competent civil court in accordance with law.…” 2. Heard Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent and repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against him. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the PGRS complaint of one Inuganti Kiran, dated 22.12.2025, the petitioner was called to the police station once, for preliminary enquiry and no crime has been registered against him. 4 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 204/2026 Dated.06.01.2026 UPS